评论失落的艺术出版社欧宝体育网络波动 //www.senadeluna.com 2021年5月14日星期五15:20:22 +0000 每小时 1 Toolnut对《可怕维度》的评论 //www.senadeluna.com/2021/05/13/fearsome-dimensions/#comment-71981 Toolnut 2021年5月14日星期五15:20:22 +0000 //www.senadeluna.com/?p=45969#comment-71981 I think what makes the drawings confusing, at least in this post, is the angle they are presented to the reader. We are used to measuring angles off of the horizon or a line perpendicular to the horizon. If it is rotated it can cause confusion. For example, in the first pic the chair seat is parallel to the horizon but if you were to see it in a room the seat would be angled so your brain wants to make the adjustment because it not used to seeing a chair presented at this angle. In the last pair of drawings , Section A-A and Section B-B, the line that is perpendicular to the seat bottom that is used to measure the angle of the leg isn’t presented to the reader as perpendicular. So we want to rotate them. And if we were to measure the angles on the bench, the seat would be flat on the bench (rotated from the drawing). Not a criticism, just a possible explanation as to why they seem confusing. Yes all the pertinent information is there. It’s just not intuitive as the drawings are currently presented.

I think what makes the drawings confusing, at least in this post, is the angle they are presented to the reader. We are used to measuring angles off of the horizon or a line perpendicular to the horizon. If it is rotated it can cause confusion.

For example, in the first pic the chair seat is parallel to the horizon but if you were to see it in a room the seat would be angled so your brain wants to make the adjustment because it not used to seeing a chair presented at this angle.

In the last pair of drawings , Section A-A and Section B-B, the line that is perpendicular to the seat bottom that is used to measure the angle of the leg isn’t presented to the reader as perpendicular. So we want to rotate them. And if we were to measure the angles on the bench, the seat would be flat on the bench (rotated from the drawing).

Not a criticism, just a possible explanation as to why they seem confusing. Yes all the pertinent information is there. It’s just not intuitive as the drawings are currently presented.

评论可怕的维度木工 //www.senadeluna.com/2021/05/13/fearsome-dimensions/#comment-71980 woodworkerme 2021年5月14日星期五14:59:28 +0000 //www.senadeluna.com/?p=45969#comment-71980 我的丈夫从高中毕业到退休都是马基绞车的机械师。He couldn't cut a 2x4 without detailed plans and layout. He did make a lot of things in our shop, end tables, specialty cases, and more. but he needed detailed plans and most times he could draw them up himself. Me I don't build from plans I just need a sketch or a pic and some number ( H x W x D ) like the Irish chair. I ask you (Christopher) for the numbers for that chair. I need to say thank you for that. I did build that chair and it came out okay. some people need long detailed instructions and some people just need a drawing with the measurements. My husband would get so frustrated working with me on a project because of our different styles in the way we approach a it. 我的丈夫是一个机械师,从他高中毕业的第二天,直到他退休的马基绞车。He couldn’t cut a 2×4 without detailed plans and layout. He did make a lot of things in our shop, end tables, specialty cases, and more. but he needed detailed plans and most times he could draw them up himself.
Me I don’t build from plans I just need a sketch or a pic and some number ( H x W x D ) like the Irish chair. I ask you (Christopher) for the numbers for that chair. I need to say thank you for that. I did build that chair and it came out okay. some people need long detailed instructions and some people just need a drawing with the measurements. My husband would get so frustrated working with me on a project because of our different styles in the way we approach a it.

tsstahl的《可怕的维度》评论 //www.senadeluna.com/2021/05/13/fearsome-dimensions/#comment-71979 tsstahl 2021年5月14日星期五14:47:57 +0000 //www.senadeluna.com/?p=45969#comment-71979 In reply to <a href="//www.senadeluna.com/2021/05/13/fearsome-dimensions/#comment-71969">Sam Yamron</a>. I used to do the same thing. Until I ended up with a low six legged pie safe with too much splay. And the damn cup holder was off kilter about 18 degrees. :) Seriously, I'm in the Frankenstein school of design, too.

In reply to Sam Yamron。< / p >

I used to do the same thing. Until I ended up with a low six legged pie safe with too much splay. And the damn cup holder was off kilter about 18 degrees.

Seriously, I’m in the Frankenstein school of design, too.

Michael Nicley对《可怕维度》的评论 //www.senadeluna.com/2021/05/13/fearsome-dimensions/#comment-71978 迈克尔Nicley 2021年5月14日星期五14:39:50 +0000 //www.senadeluna.com/?p=45969#comment-71978 In reply to <a href="//www.senadeluna.com/2021/05/13/fearsome-dimensions/#comment-71968">antinonymous</a>. Some proof that everyone reads differently: I was about to suggest doing away with the drafting terms like "Section A-A" and using more vernacular language like "front leg sightline cross-section"... but then, I suppose I'm suggesting five words where two suffice. < span style =" font - family:宋体;font - family:宋体;"使用更多的方言,比如前腿视线横断面;但是,我想我建议用五个词来形容两个人就足够了 评论安东尼的《可怕的维度》 //www.senadeluna.com/2021/05/13/fearsome-dimensions/#comment-71977 安东尼 2021年5月14日星期五14:39:44 +0000 //www.senadeluna.com/?p=45969#comment-71977 现货! < p >现货!< / p > 菲兹的《可怕的维度》 //www.senadeluna.com/2021/05/13/fearsome-dimensions/#comment-71976 弗茨 2021年5月14日星期五12:18:13 +0000 //www.senadeluna.com/?p=45969#comment-71976 In reply to <a href="//www.senadeluna.com/2021/05/13/fearsome-dimensions/#comment-71967">johncashman73</a>. I chuckled. < span style =" font - family:宋体; David Oehrke的《可怕的维度》评论 //www.senadeluna.com/2021/05/13/fearsome-dimensions/#comment-71975 大卫Oehrke 2021年5月14日星期五12:15:53 +0000 //www.senadeluna.com/?p=45969#comment-71975 题目说有七种不同的学习方式我们有一个特定的使用顺序。它们是音乐的、空间的、内在的、动力的、逻辑的、语言的和人际的。更有逻辑的学习者将需要绘制出每一个细节,而空间学习者只需要视觉。在网上有更多关于这个的信息,因为我不是一个作家,可能正在屠杀这个。我必须有“音乐”,而我的身体(动能)工作和需要简单的草图(空间)。只是一个例子。作为一名教师,了解我们如此不同的头脑如何工作来完成一项任务似乎很有价值。Just a thought. David 题目说有七种不同的学习方式,我们有一个特定的使用顺序。它们是音乐的、空间的、内在的、动力的、逻辑的、语言的和人际的。更有逻辑的学习者将需要绘制出每一个细节,而空间学习者只需要视觉。在网上有更多关于这个的信息,因为我不是一个作家,可能正在屠杀这个。我必须有“音乐”,而我的身体(动能)工作和需要简单的草图(空间)。只是一个例子。作为一名教师,了解我们如此不同的头脑如何工作来完成一项任务似乎很有价值。Just a thought. David